|
|
The following is
is an article from
www.worldnetdaily.com. This is a
website that often lets you read the other
half of the story. Please feel free to
support it.
WASHINGTON – A United Nations climate change
conference in Poland is about to get a
surprise from 650 leading scientists who
scoff at doomsday reports of man-made global
warming – labelling them variously a lie, a
hoax and part of a new religion.
Later today, their voices will be heard in a
U.S. Senate minority report quoting the
scientists, many of whom are current and
former members of the U.N.'s own
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
About 250 of the scientists quoted in the
report have joined the dissenting scientists
in the last year alone.
In fact, the total number of scientists
represented in the report is 12 times the
number of U.N. scientists who authored the
official IPCC 2007 report.
Here are some
choice excerpts from the report:
- "I am a
skeptic ... . Global warming has become
a new religion." -- Nobel Prize Winner
for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
- "Since I
am no longer affiliated with any
organization nor receiving any funding,
I can speak quite frankly ... . As a
scientist I remain skeptical." --
Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne
Simpson, the first woman in the world to
receive a Ph.D. in meteorology and
formerly of NASA who has authored more
than 190 studies and has been called
"among the most pre-eminent scientists
of the last 100 years."
- Warming
fears are the "worst scientific scandal
in the history ... . When people come to
know what the truth is, they will feel
deceived by science and scientists." --
U.N. IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr.
Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning Ph.D.
environmental physical chemist.
- "The
IPCC has actually become a closed
circuit; it doesn't listen to others. It
doesn't have open minds ... . I am
really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize
has been given on scientifically
incorrect conclusions by people who are
not geologists." -- Indian geologist Dr.
Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University
and a board member of the U.N.-supported
International Year of the Planet.
- "The
models and forecasts of the U.N. IPCC
"are incorrect because they only are
based on mathematical models and
presented results at scenarios that do
not include, for example, solar
activity." -- Victor Manuel Velasco
Herrera, a researcher at the Institute
of Geophysics of the National Autonomous
University of Mexico.
- "It is a
blatant lie put forth in the media that
makes it seem there is only a fringe of
scientists who don't buy into
anthropogenic global warming." -- U.S.
Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley
B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research
Division of NOAA, the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
- "Even
doubling or tripling the amount of
carbon dioxide will virtually have
little impact, as water vapor and water
condensed on particles as clouds
dominate the worldwide scene and always
will." -- Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor
in the Department of Chemical and
Materials Engineering of the University
of Auckland, New Zealand.
- "After
reading [U.N. IPCC chairman] Pachauri's
asinine comment [comparing skeptics to]
Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain
quiet." -- Climate statistician Dr.
William M. Briggs, who specializes in
the statistics of forecast evaluation,
serves on the American Meteorological
Society's Probability and Statistics
Committee and is an associate editor of
Monthly Weather Review.
- "For how
many years must the planet cool before
we begin to understand that the planet
is not warming? For how many years must
cooling go on?" -- Geologist Dr. David
Gee, the chairman of the science
committee of the 2008 International
Geological Congress who has authored 130
plus peer-reviewed papers, and is
currently at Uppsala University in
Sweden.
- "Gore
prompted me to start delving into the
science again and I quickly found myself
solidly in the skeptic camp ... .
Climate models can at best be useful for
explaining climate changes after the
fact." -- Meteorologist Hajo Smit of
Holland, who reversed his belief in
man-made warming to become a skeptic, is
a former member of the Dutch U.N. IPCC
committee.
- "Many
[scientists] are now searching for a way
to back out quietly (from promoting
warming fears), without having their
professional careers ruined." --
Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden,
formerly of the Space Research and
Coordination Center in Pittsburgh, Pa.
-
"Creating an ideology pegged to carbon
dioxide is a dangerous nonsense ... .
The present alarm on climate change is
an instrument of social control, a
pretext for major businesses and
political battle. It became an ideology,
which is concerning." -- Environmental
Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of
Portugal, the founder of the Numerical
Weather Forecast group, has more than
150 published articles.
- "CO2
emissions make absolutely no difference
one way or another ... . Every scientist
knows this, but it doesn't pay to say so
... . Global warming, as a political
vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver's
seat and developing nations walking
barefoot." -- Dr. Takeda Kunihiko,
vice-chancellor of the Institute of
Science and Technology Research at Chubu
University in Japan.
- "The
[global warming] scaremongering has its
justification in the fact that it is
something that generates funds." --
Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo
Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific
Research in Buenos Aires and head of the
Paleontology Department at the
University of La Plata.
The report
also includes new peer-reviewed scientific
studies and analyses refuting man-made
warming fears and a climate developments
that contradict the theory.
It is 4 degrees Celsius (39 Fahrenheit)
today in Poznan, Poland, where the U.N.
conference is being held.
Next
we will
run an article on the "humanist religion" to
see if you can notice a link between the two
subjects, and why global warming is such a
political - not scientific - issue.
|
Send mail to
johncoish@rogers.com
with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2008 Church of God, International
Last modified:
12/12/2008
|
|
|